Transcribe Work speech recording Neevo

Jojobelle said:

I had the 150 tasks i completed not "pass the quality guidelines" unfortunately.

It is frustrating when you score 9/10 on thier Test for the Tasks and then fail the actual tasks. Lucky i only put in about an hours effort into it.

I knew that a task like this would be highly subjective.

I hope your 500 tasks get OK'd

Thanks

Click to expand...

283 tasks completed for me and I’ve got the same didnt meet quality standards. Really not happy!

I'm assuming I passed "quality standards" because I don't have the message but this task is so subjective. I don't really know what quality standards would even mean in this task.

I completed 120 and are still in submitted so hopefully mine will be approved

Has anyone just had a feedback email from Neevo?

It would be very useful but it says look for your ID code in the list to see what mistakes you’ve made, but my ID code is not in the list?

No feedback email here, and the job is just showing as closed in my history.

I still think it's worth arguing the toss if they try to not pay for these. It's utterly subjective. Giving feedback when you're comparing apples with oranges isn't helpful at all.

EdibleDormouse said:

No feedback email here, and the job is just showing as closed in my history.

I still think it's worth arguing the toss if they try to not pay for these. It's utterly subjective. Giving feedback when you're comparing apples with oranges isn't helpful at all.

Click to expand...

Sorry it was for the correction job I’m talking about. It says I am almost at the threshold to not be paid for all tasks, but I think that might just be a generic email that they’ve sent to everyone? Because further down it says look for your ID code in the list to see where you’ve gone wrong, and I’m not on the list.

rich110991 said:

Sorry it was for the correction job I’m talking about. It says I am almost at the threshold to not be paid for all tasks, but I think that might just be a generic email that they’ve sent to everyone? Because further down it says look for your ID code in the list to see where you’ve gone wrong, and I’m not on the list.

Click to expand...

Ah, no. I've not had that. Sorry, I misunderstood.

I've been doing the correction job and haven't had an email like that. Maybe it was sent to you by mistake if your ID isn't on it.

I got a second payment for that job the other day, hoping to still be paid for the rest that I have done. And hoping that there's more tasks to do on it soon as it's saying no more tasks for me again now.

Ok so it turns out I am on the list. I'm on 87% at the minute and the threshold is 84%.

I've just asked them if they can be a bit clearer because they're saying if you get blocked then you won't be paid for a portion of your tasks. What is a portion then? I've just said I need to know if it is worth continuing or not.

Angel81 said:

I've been doing the correction job and haven't had an email like that. Maybe it was sent to you by mistake if your ID isn't on it.

I got a second payment for that job the other day, hoping to still be paid for the rest that I have done. And hoping that there's more tasks to do on it soon as it's saying no more tasks for me again now.

Click to expand...

I don't think we're talking about the same one. I mean the correction job for $0.14 which they said they would pay for all submitted tasks unless you get blocked.

Oh no I didn't get that job to do. Hopefully you will get paid for them all and sort it all out.

Angel81 said:

Oh no I didn't get that job to do. Hopefully you will get paid for them all and sort it all out.

Click to expand...

I did to 1900 and got paid for all fo them, but then it went up to $0.14 and I've done 100 so far but now they're saying I'm 3% away from being blocked and I don't know how big this "portion" is that they're saying I won't be paid for if I get blocked. Hard to judge whether it's worth it or not.

I've not had that email for the $0.14 corrections and done 600 in total now. Do you mind copy and pasting without the IDs Rich?

Hi Rich,

Thank you so much for working in our special correction job!

Unfortunately we are unable to provide you with automatic feedback regarding your work but we are trying to still monitor closely and let our crowd know when we spot anything specific.

As such, we wanted like to inform you that you are close to falling under our quality threshold (84% of score) - or already fell below that. As you know, we are checking the quality in our jobs and monitoring closely what is happening in them. We really want you to keep working so we would like to help you, as if you were to fall under the threshold, you would eventually get blocked and a part of your tasks would sadly be invalidated.

In order to help you, please find below your score and overview of the most common mistakes we've identified in your work:

How does it work ?
You received for this project an ID. You can find this ID at the end of the URL of the job, as you can see highlighted in the screenshot below.

Look for your ID in the list below and check the feedback on your work. You can see the categories in which you have been doing some mistakes (see the x crosses in the columns). Please go back to the guidelines and check the points regarding those categories that we have indicated for you. If you have any questions, please reach out.



Which exact mistake did I do?
Unfortunately we can't be this precise in our feedback but please check the guidelines. If you're unsure about some of the instructions, please contact us.

How can I improve?
Pay extra attention to those categories that we have indicated above in which you have missed.

rich110991 said:

Hi Rich,

Thank you so much for working in our special correction job!

Unfortunately we are unable to provide you with automatic feedback regarding your work but we are trying to still monitor closely and let our crowd know when we spot anything specific.

As such, we wanted like to inform you that you are close to falling under our quality threshold (84% of score) - or already fell below that. As you know, we are checking the quality in our jobs and monitoring closely what is happening in them. We really want you to keep working so we would like to help you, as if you were to fall under the threshold, you would eventually get blocked and a part of your tasks would sadly be invalidated.

In order to help you, please find below your score and overview of the most common mistakes we've identified in your work:

How does it work ?
You received for this project an ID. You can find this ID at the end of the URL of the job, as you can see highlighted in the screenshot below.

Look for your ID in the list below and check the feedback on your work. You can see the categories in which you have been doing some mistakes (see the x crosses in the columns). Please go back to the guidelines and check the points regarding those categories that we have indicated for you. If you have any questions, please reach out.

Which exact mistake did I do?
Unfortunately we can't be this precise in our feedback but please check the guidelines. If you're unsure about some of the instructions, please contact us.

How can I improve?
Pay extra attention to those categories that we have indicated above in which you have missed.

Click to expand...

Thanks for sharing that. I've found there have been quite a few jobs from the Australian lot in with these, specifically between an Australian woman and what sounds like a South African guy. I'm guessing these have been included as a test for the non-native tag. Also some jobs have the loud robotic "thank you" at the end which I'm never sure how we're meant to tag now. Have you noticed anything else odd? The quality of the actual transcriptions is much higher than in the other correction job, that's for sure. Maybe it's another AI program being tested.

Champion87 said:

Thanks for sharing that. I've found there have been quite a few jobs from the Australian lot in with these, specifically between an Australian woman and what sounds like a South African guy. I'm guessing these have been included as a test for the non-native tag. Also some jobs have the loud robotic "thank you" at the end which I'm never sure how we're meant to tag now. Have you noticed anything else odd? The quality of the actual transcriptions is much higher than in the other correction job, that's for sure. Maybe it's another AI program being tested.

Click to expand...

On that list I'm the one that's got 87%. So I've made mistakes with cut offs, don't see how lol?! Misheard words, that I can believe. Repetitions, again I can believe that because it's awkward sometimes. Non-native, yeah if I haven't tagged the Australian woman. And no correction needed, really?!

rich110991 said:

On that list I'm the one that's got 87%. So I've made mistakes with cut offs, don't see how lol?! Misheard words, that I can believe. Repetitions, again I can believe that because it's awkward sometimes. Non-native, yeah if I haven't tagged the Australian woman. And no correction needed, really?!

Click to expand...

I've had several with the Australian woman that have had cut offs at the end so I'm thinking those are maybe their quality control ones. Really frustrating to correct the whole thing and find the end is cut off, as it's all pointless. So I skip to the end before working on the Australian woman now. We do have to still correct the non native ones.

There's one very 'forward', lively sounding voice which is a friend of mine that does voiceover work. I'm probably breaking all kinds of rules and regs by telling you, but let's just say that if you get her, it's probably a test prompt.

Champion87 said:

I've had several with the Australian woman that have had cut offs at the end so I'm thinking those are maybe their quality control ones. Really frustrating to correct the whole thing and find the end is cut off, as it's all pointless. So I skip to the end before working on the Australian woman now. We do have to still correct the non native ones.

Click to expand...

I thought we had to correct ones with cut offs too?

rich110991 said:

I thought we had to correct ones with cut offs too?

Click to expand...

- Cut off ([c_o/]): the recording ends abruptly, cutting off a word at the beginning and/or end of the file. Here, you will only need to verify the correct use of this tag, disregarding the rest of the transcript. For an example of an audio where you need to add the cut-off tag, see below.