silverhoop said:
[member=2349]Danny[/member] [member=143]auntygeek[/member]
What system of ACCA's are you using?
Not really got in to them yet. I had a look at the Lay all option on the PA site but haven't tried it yet.
Is this the one that you are using or the Phil Kent method?
Cheers
Working on a list of pros and cons for them all.
They serve different purposes...
- do you want to check each result and place a new lay each leg?
- do you want to lay all at once and only cash out if there's a loss?
- do you want to be able to lay events happening on the same day, leave it and go without checking back... But spend longer finding low matches or risk a small loss if only one leg loses?
They are: PA method, Phil Kent and Lay All respectively.
Personally I like the thought of Laying all in advance. So that's Phil Kent or Lay All. I don't like the risk of the loss with Lay All so I'll try Phil Kent, with the odd Lay All when there are some good matches with favourites odds on to win. This will mix it up and make it look more muggy.
I see the lay all as the 'low risk' equivalent of a casino offer. There's a chance you'll lose £5 if just one leg loses but you could also win £10 profit if all legs win, or if you have more than one loss.